Same-sex marriages

Introduction aforementioned(prenominal) finish matings involves coming in concert of a two people of the equivalent gender to form a family. These conjugal unions atomic number 18 non recognized in close countries in the world. In the U.S, only the states of Iowa and mom allow spanking sum ceremonys. The state Vermont recognizes polite unions, which argon similar however lesser than unitings. Civil unions do non batten downwardly the couples full rights enjoyed in hymenealss. The Federal Government, chthonian the Defense of br differenthood Act of 1996, does non recognize identical invoke marriages scarce leaves individual states the room to deliberate on acceptable forms gay unions. (Strasser, Mark, 199414) festive people rich person stepped up to campaigns for recognition of same sex marriages. While gay people leave been granted equal rights in numerous fields in life much(prenominal) as employment, they ar denied the right to marriage. A complex argu ment has come up prop unrivalednts of same sex marriages on angiotensin-converting enzyme side and opponents on the different all(prenominal) presenting their drumheads. (Vesterman, W, 19942) The of import controversy has been the definition of marriage. unfearing people want the right to marry, feign and raise children. Legalization of same-sex marriages would exact an advert on all human perspectives. Businesses would accordance employees from gay marriages same treatment. There would be social realignment and allocation of determination in party. spectral bodies, more so Christians and Muslims principal sum the anti-gay marriages campaign.Thesis statementSame-sex marriages should non be legalized.Arguments for Same-sex marriages go against nature. unification is meant to be a union of one man and one adult female. It is an ab radiation patternity to father feelings to a person of the same gender. bulk argon born male and female person to compliment each other i n marriage. It is only by choice and motion picture to gay tendencies that they become gay. Gay tendencies be not exhibited by any(prenominal) other form of life so as to suggest its is a natural phenomenon. Animals, stock-still the closest primates, do not video display gay behavior. To legalize a marriage founded on an unnatural behavior would tinct the notion of marriage, as we know it.Same-sex unions atomic number 18 not fit to raise children in. The pargonnts kinship is not favourable to raising children in a correct way. Children raised in these unions would be predisposed to gay behaviour. They would not be given a run into to live practice lives. Children grow up learning through copying maternal actions, as they are not good enough to make informed decision. Legalizing such a marriage would be exposing pick disclose children to unnatural acts.(Patterson, Charlotte, 2001346)Legalizing same-sex marriages would lead to other anti-social behaviors. fair(a) a s gay individual would energise succeeded in legalizing their cause, others would alike come out and bring their rights. It may lead to a rise in incest and bestiality. These individuals would ceaselessly drop curtain back on to the case of the same-sex marriage to argue out their point. Polygamists would also demand recognition by law. It would to lead to absurdities such as an individual entering into to a union with an animal and demanding legal recognition. He or she would use the same arguments pushed by pro-gay marriages activists today.The marriage inception has an all-important role of procreation. This role is best performed in a marriage. Same-sex marriages by design lack the competency to procreate. Without the ability to perform this role, the marriage would be incomplete. Without procreation, humankind would not regenerate itself. The accompaniment that gay marriage proponents are in the first place in nations with low birth range is worrying. Legalizing same- sex marriage would be putting perpetuity of man in jeopardy in the long run.Legalizing gay marriages would be tantamount(predicate)(predicate) to giving gay people promote status. Gays want their productions to be treated in the same way as those of the disable and the chronically ill. They however do not want to be treated the same way as pedophiles, masochists or charge cannibals. These are people who choose to be the way they are and therefore do not merit special status. In their pleas for favored states, they use words remove with emotions to gain sympathy such as discrimination, homophobia and tolerance.Traditionally and morally, marriage is a man and woman affairs. As a society we cannot failure the traditions and morals that have always catch us and maintained disposition. The society does not have to be immoral to advance. Legalizing same-sex marriages testament tear the fabric that holds society together. It give create a sense of discommode and loss of dire ction for men. This social order must be closely guarded.(www.cnn.com)Legalizing same-sex marriage would be great experimentation with such as sensitive matter. The same sex marriage euphoria is the West might have dangerous results since it has no been time-tested before. Since same-sex relationships have gained prominence in the extend twenty years, their long-term effects cannot be projected. This euphoria has been fueled by semi semipolitical correctedness that makes people approve even the close to absurd ideas.Arguments Against.Failure to legalize same-sex marriages will be denial of individuals their fundamental right. It would be tantamount to authorities intrusion into ones private life. The government should not stop consenting adults from marriage whether gay or heterosexual. Equality should be chance onn to prevail. Just as the government keeps forth from straight marriages, it should also keep absent the same sex marriages.(Scott, Bidstrup, 2004)Not legalizing same-sex marriages would be locomote victim to stereotypes. Straight people see gay people as worthless and non-committal. Straight people are prejudiced not because, homosexuality is necessary bad, but because they are uncomfortable with it. They are terror-stricken of any changes in society unheeding of their impact.Continued incrimination of same-sex marriage is collectable to phantasmal overstepping their mandates. The perform oversteps its mandate by wonderful its policies on the nation. There is little departure between the church and the state. Politicians join the churchs course to gain political support in form bourgeois churchgoers.Majority in society have always oppressed the minority. What is now being seen in the same sex marriage issue was experienced in slavery period. Religious bodies and groups who supported and even engaged in slavery and subsequent segregation have no moral grounds to point out same-sex marriages.Proponents of same sex marriages argue that legalisation would in fact strengthen the institution of marriage. Divorce rate would go down because gay people would not be forced into unions with people of the opposite gender. Gay people may try to conform to societal norms and marry the opposite gender. They end-up in unhappy unions that lead to divorce. Legalization would also reduce stress related problems such as suicide and depression due to denial of right to be de jure married.Proponents of same-sex marriages also argued that gay marriages have capacity to bring up children in the normal way. They point-out that what a child needs is not heterosexual parents but tender mete out and nurturing. They argue that same-sex couples can fork over that pity just like straight parents.Pro-gay marriage groups insist that gay people are born rather than choosing to be gay. They involve that they are born with gay tendencies inherent. They point out that nobody would choose to be ridiculed and victimized through out their life. If it were something they would control they would just opt for the easier option of heterosexuality. Criminalizing same-sex marriages would be failure to recognize the predicament set roughly gay people.(Pinello, Daniel, R, 2006 76)Conclusion.Same-sex marriages should not be legalized chthonic any circumstance. It is a social demonic that should not permeate into society. The government should project into the interests or the society and criminalize same-sex marriages. It should not fall for emotional talk about discrimination and homophobia. The usage of homophobia tires the portray those debate to gay marriages as suffering from a mental condition. (Patterson, Charlotte, 2001 )The society should resist any attempts to portray same-sex marriage as normal and natural. It is not evident in other forms of life. The claim that gay people are born is also a fallacy. They are people who have reformed their gay tendencies showing that it is really a choice. homoeroticism ca nnot be determined by scientific inquiry of the DNA. All forms of consented sex and unions are voluntary.The marriages institutions cannot be strengthen by undermining its main foundations. Same-sex marriages disrupt the main principle of marriage. Same-sex couples are not able to offer proper care for kids. Such a marriage is unstable and do not provide the right environment for raising children.We should not embrace change just for the pursuit of change. Restructuring the age-old basic unit of society would be a historical mistake. The US should set precedence in protect this all-important institution.ReferencesPinello, Daniel R., Americas Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. Cambridge University Press, 2006 76.Strasser, Mark, The Challenge of Same-Sex Marriage Federalist Principles and Constitutional Protections. Praeger, 1999 14Patterson, Charlotte J., Same-Sex Marriage and the Interests of Children, Virginia Journal of fond Policy & Law, 9346. 2001Vesterman W. translation and Writing Short Arguments. London Mayfield, 1994 p2, 4.CNN News, governing Bush Calls For Ban on Same Sex Marriage, 05/02/2004. Retrieved on 10/10/07 from http//www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/02/24/elec04.prez.bush.marriage/Scott Bidstrup. Gay Marriages The Arguments and The Motives, 2004. Retrieved on 10/10/07 from http//www.bidstrup.com/marriage.htm