.

Sunday, March 10, 2019

“An Outpost of Progress”: Ideology and Action

Simplifying the act uponions for both(prenominal) sides in relation to political theory, the subscripts actions are pose on a spectrum of accepting that ideology to rebelling against it and the maestro on a spectrum of the action of imposing his own ideology to the lack of imposition. As verbalise earlier, due to there existence a lack of action the superior is then able to potenti in ally see the wrongs in his actions while the inferior is constantly stuck in a place of action without ability to consider ? a victims complex.The short story An Outpost of Progress, written by Joseph Conrad, speaks just about the Individual and the force the courage, the composure, the confidence the emotions and the principles every great and every peanut thought belongs not to the Individual but to the crowd to the crowd that believes blindly In the Irresistible Orca of Its Institutions and of its morals, In the power of Its police and of Its judg manpowert (Conrad 2). The idea Conrad give s that an individual is solo capable of thinking and/or believe what his environment suggests is meant to refer specifically to the colonizers (European) ideology.French essayist Albert Mermen would disagree with Concords ideas about the crowd and the individual, however (similar to Conrad) his text The Colonizer and The Colonized places its focus on the flaws of the colonizers ideology rather than ideology in general. Though the intention f both texts is to give an outlook on a specific ideology and the style it should be questioned by settled and colonizer alike, it is also a approach to think deeper about and question political theory ? ones own and others ? In general.Looking alone at religion and the evident religious aspects In the story and the act of colonization In general, both the colonized and the colonizers are subject to the Ideology of religion. Asserts and bearer, the colonist characters, are Christian machinate (or Henry Pricel a native, believes in dark spi rits. The way the story ends can be interpreted two ways if the bat the colonists give up (realizing defeat) or they realize the wrongs in their Christian European ideology and the act of forcing it upon others, veritable(a) indirectly.Putting the focus on religion, one could say that the dark spirits Make believes in brought about the two mens downfall. Ignoring the idea of the dark spirits, Asserts and Carrier more likely had reflected upon their actions and realized the Christian faith and the corresponding ideology is not universal truth. Asserts and Carrier are how Mermen describes the colonists eye or assumptions toward the colonized Nothing could crack Justify the colonizers privileged position than his Industry, and nothing could better Justify the colonized destitution than his Indolence.The mythical portrait of the colonized then Includes an unbelievable laziness, and that of the colonizer, a virtuous taste for action (Mimi 123). The two men are said Mimi explains the colonist view point The point is that the colonized means little to the colonizer. Far from wanting to understand him as he really is, the colonizer is preoccupied with making him undergo this urgent miscellanea (Mimi 127).For the Illinois to see Make as the opposite of what a native is mantic to be according to what they had been taught would be a shock of reality being put into a new situation makes it so prior-assumptions can be replaced with real life observations. Based on observations made, the concept of forcing now true people into slavery appears different. The initial progress for the colonist characters in general is to successfully colonize the new land, potentially halting progress for the colonized and their society.Mimi says, What is light(a) is that colonization weakens the colonized ND that all those weaknesses contribute to one some other (Mimi 159). The progress changes meaning for colonizers and becomes more-so a sense of awakening for the colonizer and carr ies a darker literal message Progress was calling to Asserts from the river. Progress and civilization and all the virtues. Society was calling to its accomplished child to come, to be taken divvy up of, to be instructed, to be Judged, to be condemned it called him to return to that rubbish heap from which he had wandered away, so that Justice could be done (Conrad 16).Asserts had failed his session, but due to his fruition and not due to a lack of ability to succeed. The two men died by acknowledging the fact that they were both slave dealers, to them a dirty thing to be which, once put out there, caused Asserts to kill his assistant and then reach suicide himself. The symbolism in Asserts death relating to the crucifix is powerful and makes his intentions lighten up Asserts realized the Christian religion and his European ideology were not the only way and that his people, himself inclusive, were forcing the native people into something that was not correct.

No comments:

Post a Comment