Comparisons of war poems Essay

In exploring the portrayal of fight in the poetry of Wilfred Owen and Shakespeare one can see the contrasting attitudes and realities of warfare. In to begin with Agincourt set in 1415 still by Shakespeare, he portrays the glory and laurels in war, whilst Anthem for doomed young peaceful by Wilford ingest set in 1914 is expressing the meaningless and realistic thoughts of view.In the outset stanza which Shakespeare has composed in the poesy originally Agincourt. He uses manipulating concepts that convey the message that war is a great adventure and that you should die for your country. Whilst Anthem for Doomed youth is doing the exact opposite and tries to convince the reader that war is a rack upensive ordeal. As the two poems where written in an interval of five cardinal years it shows us very clearly the different point of fewer people had in their perspective time about war.Before Agincourt is a very patriotic and heroic poem. In the first stanza Shakespeare uses a brave step. He uses emotional adjectives and verbs to make the reader feel the same as he does. He also uses a lot of positive nouns to bring about this affect e.g. greater share of honour Gods will. there is not much alliteration or whatsoever form of onomatopoeia in the first stanza.The second stanza uses a lot of emphasised words and longer pauses in the first place the next line he also uses repetition of words startle with M. In the last stanza of the poem he does not use any assonance, onomatopoeia and alliteration technics to emphasize his poem. He only uses strong punctuation and pauses to effect a very positive approach on war. This poem could be used as a propaganda device.Anthem for Doomed Youth composed by Wilford Owen.In the title of this poem Wilford is expressing that war is negative. Doom is a simile to convey inevitability of death, Doom also uses assonance with the reprise Os. It has an affect of being scary and threatening.The first stanza uses repetition to contribute rhythm and onomatopoeias to create a more realistic approach on war.The second stanza uses a lot of repetition and emphasised words. e.g. No mockeries, no prayers nor bells. No mockeries is implying no more joy and that they cant be mocked any more because they have perished. The No is also emphasised to assign the poem more rhythm. No prayers nor bells. Is repetition, it also has a sad motive.The lumber goes up to give the poem more negativity and sadness by elongating some words.The third stanza uses a rhetorical question to start off with. The mood is a lot softer. This is created by the poet using a softer tone to shorten the Ss, Ps and Rs. He uses repetition to try and enhances the readers sadness and visual imagery.There are also a lot of similes and metaphors used. E.g. pallor, paleness, brows, forehead. In the last stanza there is a vast amount of imagery of death. There is an ethical made-to-order to conclude his poem. Drawing down of blind this is what p eople at home(a) did when a close relative died.Comparing these two poems reveals that Shakespeares before Agincourt uses a lot less alliteration and repetition making the poem more joyful and honourable for war.In conclusion Shakespeare is totally glorifying war while Wilford more realistically looking at war as a horrifying killer concept. Style wise I select Shakespeare poem having a nice ring to its rhythm but the depicted object of his poem is out dated and modern man would find it unverbalized to agree with his idealistic point of views. Personally I can rede Wilfords Owens point of view better then Shakespears. War is a horrifying non justifiable matter and should not be promoted.